If you are one of the two people who’ve made it to this site, and have been here before, you may be wondering what’s going on here… well, after the previous GMF iteration was collecting dust and sitting on the sidelines, Ian and his brother (that would be me, Lee), have decided to join forces and put our minds together into a rejuvenated global mindflow. We’re currently working on the site’s design, which should be up sooner rather than later. Getting up this WordPress package is the first step in that redesign. So come back soon, and discover what the forces of light and dark are up to in the evermore peculiar world of ours (where bees are dropping like flies).
Some Topics Of Recent Explorartion:
What then, was the fate of the textile trades during this long time? overseas merchants, and the larger villages made enough cloth to find work for specialist dyers, fullers and croppers.
The departure of the Romans did not make an overwhelming difference to the textile workers. There were fewer wealthy customers, which affected the linen producers more than others, but the withdrawal of troops and officials was spread over a long period and allowed time for new customers to be found. Some Romans stayed in Britain, and the use of linen by the native population
had also grown. As for the woollen manufacturers, they were hardly affected at all by the Romans going. Exports continued, but the bulk of the cloth made in Britain had always been used in the country, and people still had to be clothed. This reliance on a market for woollen cloth within Britain was to be a permanent feature of the industry, and to stand it in good stead when trade
involved were only a fraction of the wool trade.
The Romans began to withdraw their troops from Britain in the fourth century AD, and the last left in 410. It is clear that at that time linen was being woven in many parts of Britain for sale to Roman officials and merchants. Perhaps British tribal chiefs, and their families even more, were also beginning to prefer linen to wool — certainly those who liked to imitate Roman ways did so.
The production of linen, however, was on a small scale compared to the output of woollen cloth. This was made in every town and village, almost by every family, throughout Britain. Most families had to be self-supporting in cloth as with growing food, and could not afford to buy it from anyone else. Some villages deliberately produced a surplus for sale to wealthier customers